Skip to content

Capewell

>.
Y
M
D
F
J
P
L
U
Q
?/
A
E
R
S
G
B
T
N
I
O
_-
X
Z
C
V
:;
K
W
H
<,
"'
Finger 123478910
Usage 7.73% (P91)11.48% (P95)8.52% (P9)12.31% (P40)13.25% (P70)12.84% (P45)9.16% (P51)7.48% (P43)
Same Finger Full Scissor Half Scissor Lat. Stretch
Bigram 1.02% (P71) 0.11% (P53) 4.40% (P98) 0.18% (P1)
Skipgram 4.85% (P54) 0.67% (P99) 3.32% (P92) 0.49% (P2)
No Thumbs Left Space Right Space
Weak-ish Redirs. 2.22% (P100) 1.69% (P94) 1.32% (P90)
Weak Redirects 2.46% (P100) 1.18% (P100) 1.18% (P100)
Other Same Finger 17.04% (P23) 11.94% (P28) 11.94% (P28)
Rolls : Alts 3.03 (P94) 3.39 (P98) 2.42 (P91)
2-Roll In : Out 0.96 (P34) 1.10 (P58) 0.76 (P2)
3-Roll In : Out 0.82 (P29) 0.84 (P28) 0.59 (P22)
Author
Michael Capewell
Year
2005
Finger Map
Traditional

Capewell is an early example of an “evolved” layout, evidently inspired by Klausler’s evolutionary methodology but with a tweaked fitness function that accounts for half-scissors and lateral stretches. It achieved an excellent SFB% for its time, coming in slightly behind Arensito.